History of the World/History of the World (Bureau Development, Inc.)(1992).BIN/dp/0477/04774.txt

Text File | 1992-10-12 | 13KB | 202 lines

$Unique_ID{how04774}
$Pretitle{}
$Title{World Civilizations: The Classical Period In World History
Analysis And Conclusion}
$Subtitle{}
$Author{Stearns, Peter N.;Adas, Michael;Schwartz, Stuart B.}
$Affiliation{}
$Subject{chinese
war
sunzi
china
warfare
armies
commanders
dynasty
han
battle}
$Date{1992}
$Log{}
Title:       World Civilizations: The Classical Period In World History
Book:        Chapter 5: Unification And The Consolidation Of Civilization In China
Author:      Stearns, Peter N.;Adas, Michael;Schwartz, Stuart B.
Date:        1992

Analysis And Conclusion

Analysis: Sunzi And The Shift From Ritual Combat To "Real" War

     For better or worse, the development of classical civilizations in the
Middle East, Greece, China, and India greatly advanced the business of making
war. Agricultural surpluses made it possible to support specialized fighters
and military commanders. Population growth made for larger armies that
required armor and weapons and a certain amount of training. Horses, and in
some areas camels and elephants, were raised to carry men into battle or pull
war chariots. Advances in metalworking meant steadily improving weaponry, and
the art of fortification became a major concern for early engineers and
architects. Warfare came to involve more soldiers who fought for longer
periods and suffered greater numbers of casualties. Frontier defenses and
military campaigns became one of the prime concerns and main expenses for
those who ruled civilized states.

     Despite advances in weaponry and training at least for warrior elites,
warfare in most early civilizations was a combination of ritual and chaotic
brawl. Wars were not fought during harvest times, winter months, or months
when the monsoon rains arrived. A ruler was expected to announce his intention
to attack a neighboring kingdom well in advance. Before battle, the high
priests of each ruler offered sacrifices to the gods and their readings of
various sorts of omens, not strategic considerations, determined the time and
place of combat. Battles consisted primarily of formal duels between trained
and well-armed warriors in the midst of rather confused collisions of masses
of poorly trained and armed foot soldiers, who were usually slaves or forcibly
recruited peasants. Though often fierce, the warriors' duels were in theory
regulated by codes of honor and fair play. It was unseemly, for example, for
one champion to strike another from behind or when his opponent had fallen.
Defeated champions, if they lived, were treated with great respect. Individual
initiative and deeds of heroism were at a premium.

     Duels between warrior champions were the setpiece of a battle. As the
great epics of early civilizations, such as the Indian Mahabharata and the
Greek Iliad, demonstrate graphically, great warriors cut bloody swaths through
the ranks of poorly prepared infantry and lesser fighters to get to each other
and set up the hand-to-hand combats that normally determined the outcome of
battle. The death of a commander, who was often the ruler of the kingdom at
war or a renowned champion, meant the collapse of his forces and their chaotic
flight from the field. Normally the victorious army did not destroy or capture
what remained of the opposing soldiers. The game had been played and won. The
winners either retired with their booty to prepare for the next round or began
negotiations to determine the terms on which the defeated party would submit
to their overlordship.

     The Shang and Early Zhou periods of Chinese history were filled with wars
and most of them were fought according to this ritualized pattern. But by the
Late Zhou period, some commanders and thinkers had become highly critical of
the indecisiveness and waste of the endless conflicts between the warring
states. In the 4th century B.C., Sunzi, an advisor to one of the warring
monarchs, responded to these concerns with a treatise on The Art of War, which
stands as one of the great classics of military theory. In opposition to the
ritualized approach to war, Sunzi proposed a very different vision of military
conflict. He argued that war was merely an extension of statecraft. Wars ought
not to be games or macho contests for bragging rights; they ought to be fought
only for ends that increased the territory, wealth, and power of the state.
With these aims in mind, Sunzi insisted that speed was of the essence in
warfare, and that long wars burdened the subjects of the warring rulers and
bred rebellions. He also urged that target kingdoms be captured as swiftly as
possible and with as little damage as possible. Sunzi argued that war was a
science and as such it should be the object of extensive study. Rather than
brawny warriors, commanders ought to be men well versed in organization,
strategy, and tactics. He proposed, and Chinese rulers subsequently set up,
special schools to train officers in the art of war.

     Sunzi's ideas transformed warfare in China. Rulers made every effort to
bring down rivals short of war. Bluffs, spies, threats, and saboteurs were
employed before armies were actually sent to war. Both before and after war
was actually declared, substantial state resources and large bureaucracies
were devoted to building and training armies and supplying them in the field.
Here the greater power of the shi officials in the Late Zhou era played a
critical role. As the backup for victorious armies, Shi thinkers stressed the
importance of a ruler's ability to mobilize the resources and population of
his kingdom as fully as possible. Sneak attacks were considered fair, and
feints and ruses were regularly employed by field commanders. Weather
conditions and advantageous terrain rather than the auguries of soothsayers
determined the time and place of battle. Successful generals were trained, and
their soldiers were far better drilled than in earlier times.

     Psychological devices were strongly recommended. For example, techniques
were used to make the enemy commanders angry and cause them to make foolish
moves that might demoralize their armies. Discipline rather than individual
heroics was required. This point was driven home by a ruler who had one of his
commanders beheaded because the general's troops attacked ahead of schedule,
despite the fact that this action was the key to victory. In combat, regular
formations replaced mass brawls; soldiers fought as units under the direction
of a chain of commanders. Good fighters were still valued, but now as unit
leaders rather than accomplished duelists. Quarter for a wounded enemy was
less likely to be given. The main object of battle became the destruction of
the enemy's forces as quickly as possible. The aim of warfare became the
conquest of a rival kingdom or the defense of one's own.

     Shi Huangdi's military and political successes demonstrated how effective
the reorganization of warfare along the lines suggested by Sunzi might be.
Halfway across the globe, the Greeks were independently developing comparable
patterns of warfare. In roughly the same era as Sunzi and Shi Huangdi, the
discipline and training of the smaller Greek armies culminated in Alexander
the Great's unprecedented conquests. But these successes by no means put an
end to ritual warfare between civilized peoples. Though Chinese armies tended
to be organized and led according to the prescriptions of Sunzi and other
theorists, the chivalric codes and battles centered on the duels of champions
showed a remarkable staying power. This was particularly true of societies
that were dominated by warrior elites, such as those that later developed in
India, Japan, and Europe. But conditions in the warring states and the genius
of Sunzi had led to a radically new vision of what wars were about and how
they would be fought. The effects of this vision are still felt by civilized
societies.

Conclusion: An Era Of Accomplishment And Affluence

     The four centuries of Han rule from roughly 200 B.C. to A.D. 200
represented the first wave in a cyclic succession of dynasties that would rule
China until the 20th century. Through more than two millennia, a fairly
predictable pattern was followed. Local rebellions would culminate in the
overthrow of an existing dynasty, which had either become overly oppressive,
such as the Qin, or too weak to rule effectively. For a crntury or so, the
rulers of the new dynasty would be effective and consequently China would be
relatively peaceful and prosperous. After a period of decline, one or two
capable emperors would restore the dynasty's fortunes for a time. But then,
roughly two centuries after the dynasty had been founded, prolonged decline
would set in. Foreign invasions, natural calamities, corruption, and civil
strife would sap whatever strength the dynasty had and turn the populace
against it. Rebellions, usually led by disaffected members of the army and shi
elite but sometimes led by peasants would erupt. The dynasty would be
overthrown and a new one proclaimed to succeed it. The cycle would begin anew.

     Prolonged periods of political division and civil strife followed the
fall of some dynasties, most notably the Han. Yet there was considerable
social and institutional continuity from one dynasty to the next. Though
Chinese civilization expanded and changed significantly in areas as
fundamental as the social composition of the ruling elite, marriage
arrangements, and religion, key elements came together in the Han period that
persisted into the 20th century. Among these were the assumption that
political unity was natural and desirable; the principle of rule by an emperor
served by a professional bureaucracy; and the dominance in political, social,
and cultural life of the educated shi elite. Most Chinese also had a deep
veneration for tradition and their ancestors, and laid great stress on the
importance of maintaining social harmony, self-restraint, and decorum in
dealings within the family and in the wider society. These core elements
ensured not just that Chinese civilization would survive, but that the Han
would be just the first of a succession of dynastic eras marked by major
achievements in virtually all spheres of human endeavor.

     Classical China did not produce an entirely unified culture or complete
social harmony. Major philosophical and religious schools disagreed widely
about the nature of "man" and the goals of life. Many ordinary people knew
little of the ideas of the great Chinese philosophers such as Confucius and
Laozi. They continued to believe in a variety of gods and spirits, which were
often associated with the home and kitchen, and developed rituals and
offerings to placate these supernatural beings. The elite-mass gap in Chinese
culture was considerable, in part because Chinese writing was so difficult to
master that only a smalllelite had time and money enough to learn to read and
write.

     Despite these divisions and differences, the short-lived Qin dynasty and
four centuries of Han rule had established the basic components of a
civilization that would last for thousands of years. As the achievements of
the classical age demonstrate, it was to be one of the most creative and
influential civilizations of all human history. The strength of its agrarian
base has allowed China to carry about one-fourth of the total human population
from the last centuries B.C. to the present day. The productivity of its
peasants has allowed the Chinese to support some of the world's largest cities
and one of history's largest and most creative elites. Over the centuries,
Chinese textiles, porcelain, and inventions have been traded over much of the
globe and have spurred technological revolutions in regions as distant as
Japan and Europe.

     In the Han era, the Chinese established the first universities, the first
civil service exams, and humanity's most enduring bureaucracy. In the same
period, they consolidated a distinguished tradition in political philosophy,
and began artistic experimentation that would yield rich rewards under later
dynasties. The civilization of China that came together in the classical age
of the Qin and Han was destined to dominate the history of much of Asia and
contribute significantly to the advance of civilized life throughout the
globe.